![]() Based on the reference images and the handful of shots of the car, it's reasonably accurate (within a centimeter, I'd reckon). How long has reduction of aero to allow closer racing been talked about? Too long. Not sure if this is the right spot, to post this, but I've been working on this for a bit and I thought I'd show it off. Currently, any large rule change that is purported to be aimed at improving the show is hit and hope at the best. (Daihatsu), and Toyota Motor Corporation (Toyota) will unveil prototype mini-commercial van electric vehicles (BEVs) equipped with a jointly developed BEV system. ![]() Give them the proper tools, including, I would argue, proper testbeds to provide real evidence of improvements to overtaking etc.ĭesigners will continue to innovate and reclaim performance, but at least those shaping the rules would have a chance to keep abreast of such innovation. Suzuki Motor Corporation (Suzuki), Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd. ![]() Radical change can only be achieved by technicians working apart from the teams. Designers use the opportunity to innovate and quickly reclaim lost performance.īut if there is any real consensus about the need to shape the rules in a way that allows better racing, then to rely purely on technical working groups involving vested interests (the same designers) is akin to turkeys being allowed to vote for Christmas. If rule changes were only ever imposed to limit performance, then certainly. “And is that not – at least in part – the point?”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |